Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://gographicsoutput.com/video/VkcXfBsHOOL.html Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter RAVEC Split On Prince Harry Security Preferring Optics Over His Safety According To The Telegraph. The Chestnut Man [grHqe7HwYBS] Health Updated on August 06, 2026 EDT — Published on August 06, 2026 EDT Tag: #The Chestnut Man, #real madrid valverde, #jet2 flight fuel supply update, #lindy ruffThe Royal and VIP Executive Committee, known as Ravec, is currently assessing whether to reinstate security provision for Harry and Meghan when they are in the United Kingdom. The Telegraph is reporting that there is a split within the committee. The political side believes there is too much political risk in granting taxpayer funded protection. The police and security chiefs believe he absolutely must have it due to the extant threat.Read that again. The people whose professional expertise is assessing physical danger to human beings believe Harry must have protection. The people whose professional expertise is managing political optics believe the optics are too complicated.And the optics consideration is winning.There are three Britons at large who have been jailed and then released after plotting to cause Harry harm. A stalker who is on a list of fixated individuals was within feet of him on his last two visits to London. She was in the public gallery at the High Court in January when he gave evidence. She was feet away from him. In a courtroom. In London. On two separate visits.And civil servants from the Home Office, the Cabinet Office and the Foreign Office are worried about a public backlash if he gets security.Harry's last full risk assessment was in April 2019. At that point he was placed in the highest risk category. That assessment has not been updated in seven years. The threat environment has changed significantly in the intervening period. He has published a memoir that named people and institutions. He has pursued legal action against British tabloids and won. He has spoken publicly about the royal family in ways that generated significant hostility in certain quarters. The fixated individuals have not gone away. The people who were jailed for plotting to harm him have been released.And the committee is split between the people who understand threats and the people who understand press coverage.Ravec's membership includes Sir Clive Alderton, the King's private secretary, and representatives from the Prince of Wales's household. The same King who provides his arrested brother with free accommodation, servants and an annual stipend. The same Prince of Wales whose household has been briefing against Harry's charitable work, commissioning friendly journalists to write about the Invictus Games, and apparently positioning to take over the organisation Harry founded. These are the people sitting on the committee that decides whether Harry gets security when he comes home.Harry's camp has said they are concerned the decision will again be influenced by politics rather than security and the realities of piper gilles the situation. The word again is doing significant work in that sentence. This is not the first time they believe political considerations have shaped a security decision that should be based purely on threat assessment. Harry described his court defeat on the previous security case as a good old fashioned establishment stitch-up and paul mccartney said it had an impact every single day and had prevented him from bringing Meghan and their children to the United Kingdom.He is next due in Britain in July for the one-year countdown event to the Birmingham Invictus Games. The same Invictus Games that Tom Bower has been briefed to discredit in his book. The same Invictus Games that Tom Sykes's Substack is laying groundwork to suggest William should take over. The same Invictus Games that the Invictus Games Foundation defended this week against claims that its competitors were not genuinely injured. Harry is coming to Birmingham in July and the committee that controls whether he has protection when he does is split between the people who know how dangerous his situation is and the people who are worried about how it will look.The stalker was feet away in the courtroom in January.Three people who plotted to harm him have been released from prison.The security chiefs say he absolutely must have it.The politicians say the optics are too risky.A British citizen, a father of two young children, whose last threat assessment placed him in the highest risk category, is being told that the political risk of protecting him outweighs the physical risk of not protecting him. And Charles's private secretary sits on the committee making that decision.While Charles provides Andrew, a man under criminal investigation for alleged misconduct connected to a child sex trafficking network, with servants and a stipend and a renovated five bedroom property on the Sandringham estate.The hierarchy of protection has never been clearer.Or more shameful.The security chiefs know what the threat is.The politicians know what the coverage would look like.One of those things is Harry's life.The other is someone's career calculation.And currently the career calculation appears to be winning.
Tag: #The Chestnut Man, #real madrid valverde, #jet2 flight fuel supply update, #lindy ruffThe Royal and VIP Executive Committee, known as Ravec, is currently assessing whether to reinstate security provision for Harry and Meghan when they are in the United Kingdom. The Telegraph is reporting that there is a split within the committee. The political side believes there is too much political risk in granting taxpayer funded protection. The police and security chiefs believe he absolutely must have it due to the extant threat.Read that again. The people whose professional expertise is assessing physical danger to human beings believe Harry must have protection. The people whose professional expertise is managing political optics believe the optics are too complicated.And the optics consideration is winning.There are three Britons at large who have been jailed and then released after plotting to cause Harry harm. A stalker who is on a list of fixated individuals was within feet of him on his last two visits to London. She was in the public gallery at the High Court in January when he gave evidence. She was feet away from him. In a courtroom. In London. On two separate visits.And civil servants from the Home Office, the Cabinet Office and the Foreign Office are worried about a public backlash if he gets security.Harry's last full risk assessment was in April 2019. At that point he was placed in the highest risk category. That assessment has not been updated in seven years. The threat environment has changed significantly in the intervening period. He has published a memoir that named people and institutions. He has pursued legal action against British tabloids and won. He has spoken publicly about the royal family in ways that generated significant hostility in certain quarters. The fixated individuals have not gone away. The people who were jailed for plotting to harm him have been released.And the committee is split between the people who understand threats and the people who understand press coverage.Ravec's membership includes Sir Clive Alderton, the King's private secretary, and representatives from the Prince of Wales's household. The same King who provides his arrested brother with free accommodation, servants and an annual stipend. The same Prince of Wales whose household has been briefing against Harry's charitable work, commissioning friendly journalists to write about the Invictus Games, and apparently positioning to take over the organisation Harry founded. These are the people sitting on the committee that decides whether Harry gets security when he comes home.Harry's camp has said they are concerned the decision will again be influenced by politics rather than security and the realities of piper gilles the situation. The word again is doing significant work in that sentence. This is not the first time they believe political considerations have shaped a security decision that should be based purely on threat assessment. Harry described his court defeat on the previous security case as a good old fashioned establishment stitch-up and paul mccartney said it had an impact every single day and had prevented him from bringing Meghan and their children to the United Kingdom.He is next due in Britain in July for the one-year countdown event to the Birmingham Invictus Games. The same Invictus Games that Tom Bower has been briefed to discredit in his book. The same Invictus Games that Tom Sykes's Substack is laying groundwork to suggest William should take over. The same Invictus Games that the Invictus Games Foundation defended this week against claims that its competitors were not genuinely injured. Harry is coming to Birmingham in July and the committee that controls whether he has protection when he does is split between the people who know how dangerous his situation is and the people who are worried about how it will look.The stalker was feet away in the courtroom in January.Three people who plotted to harm him have been released from prison.The security chiefs say he absolutely must have it.The politicians say the optics are too risky.A British citizen, a father of two young children, whose last threat assessment placed him in the highest risk category, is being told that the political risk of protecting him outweighs the physical risk of not protecting him. And Charles's private secretary sits on the committee making that decision.While Charles provides Andrew, a man under criminal investigation for alleged misconduct connected to a child sex trafficking network, with servants and a stipend and a renovated five bedroom property on the Sandringham estate.The hierarchy of protection has never been clearer.Or more shameful.The security chiefs know what the threat is.The politicians know what the coverage would look like.One of those things is Harry's life.The other is someone's career calculation.And currently the career calculation appears to be winning.