Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://gographicsoutput.com/video/Utc3FDzikpU.html Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Trumps Hapless DOJ Lawyers ALREADY LOSE First Court Battle In Comey Case [r1lmHyCBPwo] Health Updated on August 06, 2026 EDT — Published on August 06, 2026 EDT Trump's unqualified US Attorney, Lindsey Halligan, and the two prosecutors she brought in from the North Carolina US Attorney's Office are showcasing their incompetence in the way they are handling the prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey. Not only did the presiding judge just rule against the prosecution in the first contested issue in the case, but the DOJ prosecutors may have given Comey and his defense team even more ammunition for their motion to dismiss based on vindictive and selective prosecution. This video discusses the new ruling from Judge Nachmanoff, and why the footnote the judge dropped in his order exposes the selective nature of the Comey prosecution. For Glenn's Substack: hhtps://glennkirschner.substack.com qEVDoUWNiaJ a4jwNc7s34f 9lQ0LuICAY3 LjiMhseSLRJ wAqNWVk5BzQ K6pyZuRzWkG
Trump's unqualified US Attorney, Lindsey Halligan, and the two prosecutors she brought in from the North Carolina US Attorney's Office are showcasing their incompetence in the way they are handling the prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey. Not only did the presiding judge just rule against the prosecution in the first contested issue in the case, but the DOJ prosecutors may have given Comey and his defense team even more ammunition for their motion to dismiss based on vindictive and selective prosecution. This video discusses the new ruling from Judge Nachmanoff, and why the footnote the judge dropped in his order exposes the selective nature of the Comey prosecution. For Glenn's Substack: hhtps://glennkirschner.substack.com qEVDoUWNiaJ a4jwNc7s34f 9lQ0LuICAY3 LjiMhseSLRJ wAqNWVk5BzQ K6pyZuRzWkG